http://www.answeringmuslims.com/ http://thedebateinitiative.com/ The Qur’an presents Muhammad as the ideal role model (33:21). Yet critics are quick to point…
Oct
26
http://www.answeringmuslims.com/ http://thedebateinitiative.com/ The Qur’an presents Muhammad as the ideal role model (33:21). Yet critics are quick to point…
25 comments
No ping yet
Norman Jayden,FBI says:
October 26, 2014 at 6:11 pm (UTC 0)
Damn Sami destroyed wood, how many times did he have to correct him about
using false translations?
English Glory says:
October 26, 2014 at 6:26 pm (UTC 0)
David Wood spans his life vilifying Islam and their pious prophet. What do
you get out of this? Mr Wood.
Zac Codey says:
October 26, 2014 at 7:21 pm (UTC 0)
David Won Let Know The Truth And Truth Will Set You Free
thomas dimitriou says:
October 26, 2014 at 8:10 pm (UTC 0)
THANK YOU.
Cody Hicks says:
October 26, 2014 at 8:38 pm (UTC 0)
I can’t find a debate on “would jesus be a good role model”? Hmm I wonder
why that is?
Daniel Sarmas says:
October 26, 2014 at 9:13 pm (UTC 0)
David Wood for the WIN! :)
Waseem Amin says:
October 26, 2014 at 9:35 pm (UTC 0)
lol i was woundering affter watching the video how can people be blind not
to see david woods getting exposed refuted and owned. but then i seen. its
a cristhan channel that believes in a santnic god that needs blood to feed
hes turst .
“yhh thats the religion”
RFE says:
October 26, 2014 at 10:26 pm (UTC 0)
Atheist here; David won this by a landslide, hence the comment at the end
about the muslims in the audience looking shocked.
11REVERT says:
October 26, 2014 at 10:32 pm (UTC 0)
Arthur Glyn Leonard said:
“If ever a man on this earth found God, if ever a man devoted his life to
God’s service with a good and great motive, it is certain that the Prophet
of Arabia (Muhammad) is the man. Muhammad was not only the greatest but
truest man that humanity has ever produced”. (Arthur Glyn Leonard, Islam,
her moral and spiritual value: A Rational and Psychological Study, pages
18-19)
A Religion By God says:
October 26, 2014 at 10:40 pm (UTC 0)
As far as most people heard and saw in this video, the one who got
destroyed was Sami, I’m not a Christian but wood had the compelling
argument, and by far he won this debate.
mohammed naseeruddin says:
October 26, 2014 at 11:38 pm (UTC 0)
ASAK In the West it is very hard for you to understand the
marriage of a 9 year old girl ?
How about this
There is a difference between justification and educating. Justification
is for those who sincerely wants the truth, and educating to illiterates
because they lag in intelligence and their knowledge is based on word of
mouth from other bigots.
1400 years ago it was very common for girls to marry at that age, because
the life span then was 35-40 years. Not 1400 years ago but 1- The Bible’s
Prophets, and even Roman Emperors married girls as young as 8! [1]
2- Mary got pregnant between the ages of 11 and 14.
3- The minimum age for marriage in the US-State of Delaware in year 1880
was 7 [2].
4- According to the Jewish Talmud, Prophet Moses and his followers had sex
with girls as young as 3 years old [3]. Yes, THREE years old. You read it
right.
Do you need more information on this subject ? And ask yourselves why in
Western Culture Child Pornography is so popular.
Covering your own filthy acts behind the shield of other faith, is not only
hypocrite but disgrace to human race. Do you need more? because I can
provide you more.
Salaam (peace)
fowill1 says:
October 26, 2014 at 11:48 pm (UTC 0)
DAVID YOU ARE AWESOME, HOW YOU CAN KEEP YOU PATIENCE WHEN SAMI { CLEVER AS
HE IS – THO NOT REMOTELY AS SMART AS YOU LOL}, CONSTANTLY TWISTS THE
VERSES TO FIT HIS BELIEFS AND DOES NOT FIT THE FACTS TO THE TRUTH. I GET
THAT IT’S JUST TOO DARN HARD TO BELIEVE IN SOMETHING CLEARLY SO WRONG. BUT
THAT’S THE POWER OF CHILDHOOD INDOCTRINATION AND DECEIT. GOD LOVE SAMI,
HE;S NOT A BAD GUY, MAY JESUS LEAD HIM TO THE TRUTH. BECAUSE HE WILLNEVER
DEFEAT YOU EVEN WHEN HE FALSIFIES TWENTY CENTURY CONTEXT TO SEVENTH CENTURY
TEXT.
ravisraje says:
October 27, 2014 at 12:38 am (UTC 0)
Muslims pay Tax “Zakaat” only for poor. Correct but he forget to mention
poor muslims only. The zakaat is NOT meant for poor human beings.
nhordz says:
October 27, 2014 at 12:43 am (UTC 0)
David destroyed
mosto33 says:
October 27, 2014 at 12:56 am (UTC 0)
Sami zaatari just owned your ass
Ahmed Taqiyya says:
October 27, 2014 at 1:14 am (UTC 0)
This text David Wood quotes, Sura 5:32, originates in the Jewish Talmud
which pre-dates Islam by 1000 years. It is from the Mishna Eduyot 1:6
commenting on Genesis 4:10 in which Cain Murders Abel. It finishes ,
“Therefore was the first man, Adam, created alone, to teach us that whoever
destroys a single life, the Bible considers it as if he destroyed an entire
world. And whoever saves a single life, the Bible considers it as if he
saved an entire world.”
The Qur’an picks this up in the context of Muslims reminding the Jews what
they, not Muslim, are called upon to do by their God.
Sura 5:32 – For this reason did We prescribe to the children of Israel that
whoever slays a soul, unless it be for manslaughter or for mischief in the
land, it is as though he slew all men; and whoever keeps it alive, it is as
though he kept alive all men; and certainly Our apostles came to them with
clear arguments, but even after that many of them certainly act
extravagantly in the land.
What does it mean by “acting extravagantly”?
It means refusing to convert to Islam, refusing to accept subordination and
dhimitude under Islamic law and refusing to recognize the primacy of
Islamic (Sharia) law. If you are wondering what the penalty called for
against such free thinking “mischief” might be it tells you in the next
verse;
Qur’an Sura 5:33 – The punishment of those who wage war against Allah and
His apostle and strive to make mischief in the land is only this, that they
should be murdered or crucified or their hands and their feet should be cut
off on opposite sides or they should be imprisoned; this shall be as a
disgrace for them in this world, and in the hereafter they shall have a
grievous chastisement.
Nicegal Frommumbai says:
October 27, 2014 at 1:44 am (UTC 0)
In response to Samis rebuttal of Surah 9:29 Those messengers proclaimed to
the Emperors”Obey Islam & you wil be under our protection otherwise you
die”.I guess any king will put to death such a messenger
If you believe The Quran is Gods words you cannot say that those words or
directives were only for that context & not a general rule
Aron christian says:
October 27, 2014 at 2:38 am (UTC 0)
I am hearing a lot of door noises i wonder how man Muslim people left that
debate David you murdered them … haha
ANTIMENSCH says:
October 27, 2014 at 2:48 am (UTC 0)
lol sami isnt correct. the secound highest population of yews outside
isreal is the usa. do your research about iran, many jews left iran after
the islamic revolution. and guess what? iran and isreal were great friends
before this happend. also: iran is not an arabic country. it has its own
language, acient roots and religion. since kyros, judaism bellongs to iran
more than islam
11REVERT says:
October 27, 2014 at 2:56 am (UTC 0)
W. Montgomery Watt states:
His readiness to undergo persecutions for his beliefs, the high moral
character of the men who believed in him and looked up to him as leader,
and the greatness of his ultimate achievement – all argue his fundamental
integrity. To suppose Muhammad an impostor raises more problems than it
solves. Moreover, none of the great figures of history is so poorly
appreciated in the West as Muhammad. (W. Montgomery Watt, Mohammad at
Mecca, Oxford 1953, p. 52)
Herman47 says:
October 27, 2014 at 3:54 am (UTC 0)
David did a good job. He was able to “think on his feet,” and come up with
forceful rebuttals to Sami in a short amount of time. I do believe,
however, that rather than spend time talking about Sauda or even Muta,
David should have discussed Muhammad & SLAVERY!!! Throughout their history,
Muslims have been heavily involved in the slave trade.
Sami did a surprisingly good job, given that HE HAD TO DEFEND THE
INDEFENSIBLE. Like David, he was able to give rebuttals — if I had been
in Sami’s shoes I would have been completely flabbergasted.
David, of course, won the debate, because you can’t turn a misogynistic,
violent pedophile into a role model.
mgraber1 says:
October 27, 2014 at 4:35 am (UTC 0)
Wow, WOW, David DEVASTATED Sami! Absolutely NO contest
amhe2 says:
October 27, 2014 at 4:39 am (UTC 0)
David you are shedding a flood light on gross darkness. Sadly there is over
a billion pple who will still choose darkness
11REVERT says:
October 27, 2014 at 5:23 am (UTC 0)
“Philosopher, Orator, Apostle, Legislator, Warrior, Conqueror of ideas, the
Restorer of rational beliefs, the preacher of a religion without images,
the founder of twenty terrestrial empires and of one heavenly Empire, that
is Muhammad(pbuh) As regards all standards [I repeat, ‘ALL’] by which human
greatness may be measured, we may well ask, “Is there any man greater than
he?”
(Alphonse Lamartine, French poet)
AussieJ764 says:
October 27, 2014 at 6:10 am (UTC 0)
David smashed Sami, I bet this is one debate he wish he never took on.