«

»

Oct
26

Sami Zaatari vs. David Wood: Is Muhammad a Good Role Model for Society?

http://www.answeringmuslims.com/ http://thedebateinitiative.com/ The Qur’an presents Muhammad as the ideal role model (33:21). Yet critics are quick to point…

    JVZoo Product Feed

25 comments

No ping yet

  1. Norman Jayden,FBI says:

    Damn Sami destroyed wood, how many times did he have to correct him about
    using false translations?

  2. English Glory says:

    David Wood spans his life vilifying Islam and their pious prophet. What do
    you get out of this? Mr Wood.

  3. Zac Codey says:

    David Won Let Know The Truth And Truth Will Set You Free

  4. thomas dimitriou says:

    THANK YOU.

  5. Cody Hicks says:

    I can’t find a debate on “would jesus be a good role model”? Hmm I wonder
    why that is?

  6. Daniel Sarmas says:

    David Wood for the WIN! :)

  7. Waseem Amin says:

    lol i was woundering affter watching the video how can people be blind not
    to see david woods getting exposed refuted and owned. but then i seen. its
    a cristhan channel that believes in a santnic god that needs blood to feed
    hes turst .
    “yhh thats the religion”

  8. RFE says:

    Atheist here; David won this by a landslide, hence the comment at the end
    about the muslims in the audience looking shocked. 

  9. 11REVERT says:

    Arthur Glyn Leonard said:

    “If ever a man on this earth found God, if ever a man devoted his life to
    God’s service with a good and great motive, it is certain that the Prophet
    of Arabia (Muhammad) is the man. Muhammad was not only the greatest but
    truest man that humanity has ever produced”. (Arthur Glyn Leonard, Islam,
    her moral and spiritual value: A Rational and Psychological Study, pages
    18-19)

  10. A Religion By God says:

    As far as most people heard and saw in this video, the one who got
    destroyed was Sami, I’m not a Christian but wood had the compelling
    argument, and by far he won this debate.

  11. mohammed naseeruddin says:

    ASAK In the West it is very hard for you to understand the
    marriage of a 9 year old girl ?

    How about this
    There is a difference between justification and educating. Justification
    is for those who sincerely wants the truth, and educating to illiterates
    because they lag in intelligence and their knowledge is based on word of
    mouth from other bigots.
    1400 years ago it was very common for girls to marry at that age, because
    the life span then was 35-40 years. Not 1400 years ago but 1- The Bible’s
    Prophets, and even Roman Emperors married girls as young as 8! [1]
    2- Mary got pregnant between the ages of 11 and 14.

    3- The minimum age for marriage in the US-State of Delaware in year 1880
    was 7 [2].
    4- According to the Jewish Talmud, Prophet Moses and his followers had sex
    with girls as young as 3 years old [3]. Yes, THREE years old. You read it
    right.
    Do you need more information on this subject ? And ask yourselves why in
    Western Culture Child Pornography is so popular.
    Covering your own filthy acts behind the shield of other faith, is not only
    hypocrite but disgrace to human race. Do you need more? because I can
    provide you more.

    Salaam (peace)

  12. fowill1 says:

    DAVID YOU ARE AWESOME, HOW YOU CAN KEEP YOU PATIENCE WHEN SAMI { CLEVER AS
    HE IS – THO NOT REMOTELY AS SMART AS YOU LOL}, CONSTANTLY TWISTS THE
    VERSES TO FIT HIS BELIEFS AND DOES NOT FIT THE FACTS TO THE TRUTH. I GET
    THAT IT’S JUST TOO DARN HARD TO BELIEVE IN SOMETHING CLEARLY SO WRONG. BUT
    THAT’S THE POWER OF CHILDHOOD INDOCTRINATION AND DECEIT. GOD LOVE SAMI,
    HE;S NOT A BAD GUY, MAY JESUS LEAD HIM TO THE TRUTH. BECAUSE HE WILLNEVER
    DEFEAT YOU EVEN WHEN HE FALSIFIES TWENTY CENTURY CONTEXT TO SEVENTH CENTURY
    TEXT.

  13. ravisraje says:

    Muslims pay Tax “Zakaat” only for poor. Correct but he forget to mention
    poor muslims only. The zakaat is NOT meant for poor human beings. 

  14. nhordz says:

    David destroyed

  15. mosto33 says:

    Sami zaatari just owned your ass

  16. Ahmed Taqiyya says:

    This text David Wood quotes, Sura 5:32, originates in the Jewish Talmud
    which pre-dates Islam by 1000 years. It is from the Mishna Eduyot 1:6
    commenting on Genesis 4:10 in which Cain Murders Abel. It finishes ,
    “Therefore was the first man, Adam, created alone, to teach us that whoever
    destroys a single life, the Bible considers it as if he destroyed an entire
    world. And whoever saves a single life, the Bible considers it as if he
    saved an entire world.”

    The Qur’an picks this up in the context of Muslims reminding the Jews what
    they, not Muslim, are called upon to do by their God.

    Sura 5:32 – For this reason did We prescribe to the children of Israel that
    whoever slays a soul, unless it be for manslaughter or for mischief in the
    land, it is as though he slew all men; and whoever keeps it alive, it is as
    though he kept alive all men; and certainly Our apostles came to them with
    clear arguments, but even after that many of them certainly act
    extravagantly in the land.

    What does it mean by “acting extravagantly”?
    It means refusing to convert to Islam, refusing to accept subordination and
    dhimitude under Islamic law and refusing to recognize the primacy of
    Islamic (Sharia) law. If you are wondering what the penalty called for
    against such free thinking “mischief” might be it tells you in the next
    verse;

    Qur’an Sura 5:33 – The punishment of those who wage war against Allah and
    His apostle and strive to make mischief in the land is only this, that they
    should be murdered or crucified or their hands and their feet should be cut
    off on opposite sides or they should be imprisoned; this shall be as a
    disgrace for them in this world, and in the hereafter they shall have a
    grievous chastisement.

  17. Nicegal Frommumbai says:

    In response to Samis rebuttal of Surah 9:29 Those messengers proclaimed to
    the Emperors”Obey Islam & you wil be under our protection otherwise you
    die”.I guess any king will put to death such a messenger
    If you believe The Quran is Gods words you cannot say that those words or
    directives were only for that context & not a general rule

  18. Aron christian says:

    I am hearing a lot of door noises i wonder how man Muslim people left that
    debate David you murdered them … haha

  19. ANTIMENSCH says:

    lol sami isnt correct. the secound highest population of yews outside
    isreal is the usa. do your research about iran, many jews left iran after
    the islamic revolution. and guess what? iran and isreal were great friends
    before this happend. also: iran is not an arabic country. it has its own
    language, acient roots and religion. since kyros, judaism bellongs to iran
    more than islam

  20. 11REVERT says:

    W. Montgomery Watt states:

    His readiness to undergo persecutions for his beliefs, the high moral
    character of the men who believed in him and looked up to him as leader,
    and the greatness of his ultimate achievement – all argue his fundamental
    integrity. To suppose Muhammad an impostor raises more problems than it
    solves. Moreover, none of the great figures of history is so poorly
    appreciated in the West as Muhammad. (W. Montgomery Watt, Mohammad at
    Mecca, Oxford 1953, p. 52)

  21. Herman47 says:

    David did a good job. He was able to “think on his feet,” and come up with
    forceful rebuttals to Sami in a short amount of time. I do believe,
    however, that rather than spend time talking about Sauda or even Muta,
    David should have discussed Muhammad & SLAVERY!!! Throughout their history,
    Muslims have been heavily involved in the slave trade.
    Sami did a surprisingly good job, given that HE HAD TO DEFEND THE
    INDEFENSIBLE. Like David, he was able to give rebuttals — if I had been
    in Sami’s shoes I would have been completely flabbergasted.
    David, of course, won the debate, because you can’t turn a misogynistic,
    violent pedophile into a role model.

  22. mgraber1 says:

    Wow, WOW, David DEVASTATED Sami! Absolutely NO contest

  23. amhe2 says:

    David you are shedding a flood light on gross darkness. Sadly there is over
    a billion pple who will still choose darkness 

  24. 11REVERT says:

    “Philosopher, Orator, Apostle, Legislator, Warrior, Conqueror of ideas, the
    Restorer of rational beliefs, the preacher of a religion without images,
    the founder of twenty terrestrial empires and of one heavenly Empire, that
    is Muhammad(pbuh) As regards all standards [I repeat, ‘ALL’] by which human
    greatness may be measured, we may well ask, “Is there any man greater than
    he?”

    (Alphonse Lamartine, French poet)

  25. AussieJ764 says:

    David smashed Sami, I bet this is one debate he wish he never took on.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>